Federal Deposit Insurance v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the participant cannot sue the borrower to enforce the loan agreement, because it has no legal relationship to the borrower
• holding that the participant cannot sue the borrower to enforce the loan agreement, because it has no legal relationship to the borrower
• \It is well-settled that a depublished opinion has no precedential effect and cannot be cited as authority in any court.\
• “[i]t is well-settled that borrowers are precluded from disproving the existence of an ‘asset’ by resort to evidence that does not meet the stringent standards of § 1823 [e]”
• “[A] contractual provision for attorneys’ fees will be enforced according to its terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).