Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that collateral source rule does not preclude evidence of a third-party settlement pertaining to “common damages”
• stating that jury instructions 36 and 37 provided \general intent\ standard that was a correct explication of the meaning of \manifest intent\
• stating that jury instructions 36 and 37 provided \general intent\ standard that was a correct explication of the meaning of \manifest intent\
• stating that jury instructions 36 and 37 provided “general intent” standard that was a correct explication of the meaning of “manifest intent”
• stating that a direct loss occurs when the funds are improperly diverted
• manifest intent can be \inferred from an employee's reckless conduct and other circumstantial evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).