Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard Prusia, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard Prusia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “mere fact that a party may have prepared a summary judgment motion in reliance on an opposing party's erroneous admission does not constitute ‘prejudice’ such as will preclude grant of a motion to withdraw admissions
• holding that the “mere fact that a party may have prepared a summary judgment motion in reliance on an opposing party’s erroneous admission does not constitute ‘prejudice’ such as will preclude grant of a motion to withdraw admissions”
• concluding lack of good cause for failing to meet deadline to respond to admissions, while probative, should not be the dispositive factor
• stating that “courts are particularly responsive to allowing late answers to requests for admission when summary judgment is involved.”
• directing courts to consider the effect upon the litigation and prejudice to the resisting party “rather than focusing on the moving party’s excuses for erroneous admission”
• asking whether “the record demonstrates that the ‘admitted’ facts are contrary to the actual facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).