Skip to main content
· 4/27/1992

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Kansas Bankers Surety Company

Citations

  • 963 F.2d 289
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parties “who have bargained for strict compliance with specific time requirements ... inherently are prejudiced by noncompliance” with those deadlines
  • no showing of prejudice required where fidelity bond expressly states that no rights exist under policy if proof of loss not received prior to policy termination or cancellation and consequences of noncompliance clearly defined
  • no showing of prejudice required where fidelity bond expressly states that no rights exist under policy if proof of loss not received prior to policy termination or cancellation and consequences of noncompliance clearly defined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.