· 5/1/1979
Federal Case
Citations
- 598 F.2d 634
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \because the [district] court lacked jurisdiction it could not possibly issue the injunction in aid of its jurisdiction\
- recognizing “cases stand[ing] for the removal petition when subsequent pleadings or events reveal a [n]ew and [d]ifferent ground for removal.” (citing Fritzlen, 212 U.S. 364; Powers v. Chesapeake & Oh. Ry., 169 U.S. 92 (1898); 1A Moore’s Federal Practice P 0.168(.3-5)
- “once a district court has decided to remand a case and has so notified the state court, the district judge is without power to take any further action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.