Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. D.L. Faulkner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing preliminary injunction freezing assets where non-party \actively participated ... in transferring assets fraudulently\
• noting that date of the conduct is the relevant inquiry
• relying on Rule 65(d) to hold that district court’s extension of injunction to defendant’s wife who “actively participated” with her husband in fraudulent transfer of assets
• allowing preliminary injunction freezing assets where non-party “actively participated ... in transferring assets fraudulently”
• “A statute’s application is usually deemed prospective when it implicates conduct occurring on or after the statute’s effective date.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).