Skip to main content
· 5/1/1979

Federal Case

Citations

  • 598 F.2d 627
  • 27 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 300
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no implied intent to exclude pendent party or claim given the “broad grant of jurisdiction” in 12 U.S.C. § 1819(4)
  • “As with Aldinger, Kroger instructs us to answer the preliminary question of potential Article III jurisdiction by applying the standard enunciated in [Gibbs]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.