Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee, V

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while section 1825(b)(2) does not, extinguish an earlier lien or excuse thé payment of a tax by the FDIC, it does deny the ability to use a lien on FDIC property as a vehicle for collection of delinquent tax
• “Substantial evidence is ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable 13 mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion,’ and ‘must be “more than a mere 14 scintilla,” but may be less than a preponderance.’” (citation omitted)
• “Substantial evidence is ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable 13 mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion,’ and ‘must be “more than a mere 14 scintilla,” but may be less than a preponderance.’” (citation omitted)
• “Substantial evidence is ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable 13 mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion,’ and ‘must be “more than a mere 14 scintilla,” but may be less than a preponderance.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).