Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Shrader & York, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a legal malpractice claim brought by the FDIC was time-barred because the Texas statute of limitations had expired before the FDIC was appointed receiver
• holding that the plaintiff only needed to produce some summary judgment evidence in support of its discovery rule argument to create a genuine issue for trial (emphasis added)
• declining to place burden on defendant to negate the discovery rule in summary-judgment posture
• “Summary judgment is appropriate if, after discovery, there is no genuine dispute over any material fact.”
• placing the burden on the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).