Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Central Savings and Loan Association v. Daniel T. McSweeney Frederick C. Stalder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in the absence of intervening controlling authority, a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel is bound by its prior decisions interpreting state and federal law
• “[W]e are bound by our prior decisions interpreting state as well as federal law in the absence of intervening controlling authority.”
• \Had Congress intended this authorizing provision to limit the FDIC . . . it would have inserted the word `only' in the sentence.\
• “Absent intervening California case law, the Court is bound 3 by the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of California law.”
• in the absence of intervening controlling 28 authority, a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel is bound by its -6- 1 prior decisions interpreting state and federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).