Skip to main content
· 4/12/2001

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.

Citations

  • 21 P.3d 344
  • 2001 WL 333840
  • 52 ERC (BNA) 1488
  • 2001 Alas. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing direct private cause of action, as well as cause of action for contribution, to recover for damages to property caused by environmental contamination under AS 46.03.822
  • contemplating absentee responsible parties in AS 46.03.822(j) contribution claim and explaining how courts can “distinguish among potentially responsible parties to avoid inequitable results”
  • “[E]ven when a statute’s language meaning seems plain on its face, ambiguity may arise if applying that meaning would yield anomalous consequences.”
  • declining to address issues not raised by certifying court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.