Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Section 7-2-23(2) was the Utah legislature's way of codifying the adverse domination doctrine and therefore that, as a matter of law, the FDIC’s claims accrued when it acquired the claims upon receivership.
• “[a] motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted [is a] dismissal on the merits and is accorded res judicata effect”
• \'A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted ... [is al dismissal ... on the merits and is accorded res judicata effect.' \ (alteration in original)(quoting 2A James Wm. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 12.07 (2d ed. Supp. 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).