Feden v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a pre-trial report stating appellant suffered from post- traumatic stress disorder traits and testimony that indicating appellant suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder only differed in scientific parlance and the testimony was not outside the scope of the report
• stating that “[s]o long as the theory to which both diagnoses relate was disclosed in the original report, no further elucidation is necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).