Skip to main content
· 2/2/1984

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 727 F.2d 257
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no clear and unambiguous promise made by defendants to the effect that a deal had been made
  • finding no clear and unambiguous promise made by defendants to the effect that a deal had been made
  • draft agreements clearly stated that formal execution was required before the contract would have any binding effect
  • “These drafts ... reflect a practical business need to record all the parties’ commitments in definitive documents.”
  • reference in informal agreement to future formal agreement held to demonstrate intent of parties not to be bound
  • “when executed and delivered,” the agreement would become “a valid and binding agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman, Pratt, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.