· 2/2/1984
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-Appellee
Citations
- 727 F.2d 257
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no clear and unambiguous promise made by defendants to the effect that a deal had been made
- finding no clear and unambiguous promise made by defendants to the effect that a deal had been made
- draft agreements clearly stated that formal execution was required before the contract would have any binding effect
- “These drafts ... reflect a practical business need to record all the parties’ commitments in definitive documents.”
- reference in informal agreement to future formal agreement held to demonstrate intent of parties not to be bound
- “when executed and delivered,” the agreement would become “a valid and binding agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaufman, Pratt, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.