Skip to main content
· 6/22/1983

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,254 Thomas F. Costello, Cross-Appellant v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 711 F.2d 1361
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “essential issue of fact is whether the volume of transactions, considered in the light of the nature and objectives of the account, was so excessive as to indicate a purpose on the part of the broker to derive a profit for himself at the expense of the customer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild, Bauer, Fair-Child, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.