Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,943 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Sam Alberico v. Stanley F. Jaros

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arbitral “decision must fly in the face of clearly established legal precedent” to constitute manifest disregard
• stating that an arbitrator must refuse to heed a clearly defined legal principle in order to manifestly disregard the law
• stating that, for there to be manifest disregard, “the decision must fly in the face of clearly established legal precedent”
• stating that, for there to be manifest disregard, “the decision must fly in the face of clearly established legal precedent”
• stating that an arbitrator must refuse to heed arbitrators fail to state a reason for their decision. He stated a clearly defined legal principle in order to manifestly that courts are forced to participate in a \judicial snipe hunt\ disregard the law
• stating manifest disregard of law is a \very narrow standard of review\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).