Skip to main content
· 7/12/1994

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,372 Executone Information Systems, Inc. v. Lloyd K. Davis

Citations

  • 26 F.3d 1314
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17090
  • 1994 WL 362166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a challenge to an award “upon a matter not submitted” to the arbitrator is a jurisdictional inquiry and denying attorneys’ fees
  • stating that appellate court must sustain arbitration award even if it disagrees with arbitrator’s interpretation of underlying contract as long as arbitrator’s decision “draws its essence” from contract
  • noting that the questions of whether a party can be compelled to arbitrate and what issues a party can be compelled to arbitrate are issues for the court to decide
  • indicating that while the “essence test” is most often applied in cases involving labor relations, “we have also applied ... [it] in other cases involving the review of arbitration awards.”
  • refusing to award attorneys' fees because challenger argued award was \upon a matter not submitted\ to the arbitrator
  • considering “without justification” basis for attorneys’ fees following arbitration between company and shareholders of merged company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Jones, Kazen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.