Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,901 Louis Osofsky v. George C. Zipf, Rose Udoff v. Babcock & Wilcox Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the purpose of § 78bb(a) “is to compensate civil plaintiffs for economic loss suffered as a result of wrongs committed in violation of the 1934 Act”
• “giving the plaintiff benefit-of-the-bargain damages is appropriate only when they can be established with reasonable certainty”
• “[W]e are unwilling to require an ALJ explicitly to reconcile every conflicting shred of medical testimony[.]”
• Section 28(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 “speaks only in general terms, but we do not believe that its overall intent is to restrict the forms of nonspeculative, compensatory damages available to defrauded parties.... [W]e believe that the purpose of section 28(a
• violation of section 28(a) of the 1934 Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).