· 10/2/1980
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,648 United States of America v. John B. Mumford, United States of America v. Cortes W. Randell
Citations
- 630 F.2d 1023
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that action by SEC for prospective injunctive relief is distinct from prosecution for violation of securities laws
- deleting the phrase “federal grand jury” from an indictment did not constitute an amendment that required resubmission to a grand jury as it reduced the charges against the defendant and more accurately reflected the government’s evidence
- res judicata inapplicable between SEC proceeding for injunctive relief and criminal convictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Field, Hall, Sprouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.