Skip to main content
· 10/2/1980

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,648 United States of America v. John B. Mumford, United States of America v. Cortes W. Randell

Citations

  • 630 F.2d 1023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that action by SEC for prospective injunctive relief is distinct from prosecution for violation of securities laws
  • deleting the phrase “federal grand jury” from an indictment did not constitute an amendment that required resubmission to a grand jury as it reduced the charges against the defendant and more accurately reflected the government’s evidence
  • res judicata inapplicable between SEC proceeding for injunctive relief and criminal convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Field, Hall, Sprouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.