Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,620 Edmund J. Wentzka and Dona J. Wentzka v. Larry Gellman and Blunt, Ellis & Loewi, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]e can identify one very good reason why the district should not have reached the merits of plaintiffs' commonlaw misrepresentation claims . . . the unsettled nature of Wisconsin law in the area of justifiable reliance.\
• retention of jurisdiction over case held improper where state law was unsettled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).