Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,100 Donald J. Robertson v. Seidman & Seidman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff who admitted being on inquiry notice had hired his own lawyer, cooperated with the SEC, and intervened in prior, related litigation
• summary judgment denied notwithstanding that plaintiff admitted he believed he had been swindled, price of stock dropped 85 percent, and SEC initiated investigation
• as matter of law, earliest time statute of limitations could have started against the accountants was when SEC dis covered their complicity in the scheme to defraud
• where SEC, with its expertise and investigative abilities, did not discover defendants’ fraud, it would be unreasonable to insist that plaintiff also discover fraud
• “When conflicting inferences can be drawn from the facts, ... summary judgment is inappropriate.”
• expressly adopting the Seventh Circuit's approach in Sperry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).