Skip to main content
· 3/23/1992

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,619 Edward D. Jones & Company and Gary Aleff v. Duane Sorrells, Mildred Sorrells and Curt Sorrells

Citations

  • 957 F.2d 509
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5079
  • 1992 WL 53800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining the limits of arbitral jurisdiction is generally the function of courts, not arbitrators
  • defining the limits of arbitral jurisdiction is generally the function of courts, not arbitrators
  • “[Wjhether Section 15 bars a claim from submission to the arbitrators is for the court to decide, and it is irrelevant whether the arbitrators have already ruled on the question.”
  • trial court must determine whether section 10304 bars the arbitrator from exercising jurisdiction
  • “we do not believe that [section 35] is a clear and unmistakable expression of the parties’ intent to have the arbitrators, and not the court, determine which disputes the parties have agreed to submit to arbitration”
  • “we do not believe that [section 35] is a clear and unmistakable expression of the parties' intent to have the arbitrators, and not the court, determine which disputes the parties have agreed to submit to arbitration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.