Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,597 Julian Henley v. William Slone and Advest, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in cases filed before Ceres, one-year/three-year rule should be \applied sparingly in light of the retroactivity principles enunciated in Welch I \
• Ceres adopted \uniform limitations period of the earlier of one year from the date the fraud was or reasonably should have been discovered or three years from the date of the transaction\
• Ceres adopted “uniform limitations period of the earlier of one year from the date the fraud was or reasonably should have been discovered or three years from the date of the transaction”
• in cases filed before Ceres, one-year/three-year rale should be “applied sparingly in light of the retroactivity principles enunciated in Welch I”
• \we are unimpressed by the cogency\ of analyses finding unconstitutional Section 27A
• “we are unimpressed by the cogency” of analyses finding unconstitutional Section 27A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).