Skip to main content
· 11/18/1991

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,415 Capri Optics Profit Sharing v. Digital Equipment Corporation

Citations

  • 950 F.2d 5
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28435
  • 1991 WL 253364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding use of mandibular headlock did not constitute excessive 9 force given balance between limited nature of force and governmental interest in determining 10 whether driver was intoxicated
  • no duty to disclose material internal information unless failure to disclose renders \what was said [at an earlier time] to be misleading\
  • “It is not enough that the trustee learns of the property through other means; the property must be scheduled pursuant to section 521(1).”
  • in light of the seasonal nature of business, the alleged “order decline” should not be measured by comparing orders from “adjoining quarter[s],” but rather, should be measured on a year-over-year basis only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Aldrich, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.