Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,210 United States of America v. Danny O. Cherif

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the use of jury instructions informing the jury of the need for an unanimous verdict can cure an otherwise duplicitous indictment
• finding that a letter to a co-conspirator advising her that she did “not know anything” about their fraudulent scheme was a “subtle and somewhat clever attempt to tell her, ‘Don’t spill the beans’ ” and justified a § 3C1.1 enhancement
• letter saying, “You know you’re innocent and there is no way conceivable that you could have known any‐ thing about anything” was obstruction because it was a lie, and thus an attempt to influence the witness not to disclose what she knew
• letter saying, “You know you’re innocent and there is no way conceivable that you could have known any‐ thing about anything” was obstruction because it was a lie, and thus an attempt to influence the witness not to disclose what she knew

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).