Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,925 Arthur Young & Company v. United States District Court, Etc., Albert Kaufman, Real Parties in Interest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error in the decision to separate issues relevant to certain defenses for 10 individual adjudication at the close of the class trial
• “Bifurcation of the trial 7 of liability and damage issues is well within the scope of a trial court’s discretion under 8 Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(b).”
• “We hold that mandamus to direct the district judge to exercise his discretion to certify the question is not an appropriate remedy.”
• criticizing the requirement as a potentially \insuperable barrier to recovery\
• criticizing the requirement as a potentially “insuperable barrier to recovery”
• criticizing the requirement as a potentially \insuperable barrier to recovery\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).