Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,508 United States of America v. Norman Rubinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defense counsel, by pointing out gaps in the government’s proof that the government would “have been expected to negate previously,” did not open the door to the government’s reference to new facts on rebuttal that “it could have, but did not, introduce at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).