Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,505, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,545 Mary E. Little v. First California Company, a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendants in Blackie omitted certain material facts “from annual and interim reports, press releases and SEC filings,” and “[t]hese documents contained representations rendered inaccurate by the omissions”
• stating that in Blackie, the defendants’ “documents contained representations rendered inaccurate by the omissions” . . . but determining that “we need not go so far” because the case before it was “the purest case of an omission”
• “The categories of ‘omission’ and ‘misrepresentation’ are not mutually exclusive. All misrepresentations are also nondisclosures, at least to the extent that there is a failure to disclose which facts in the representation are not true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).