Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,589 Dennis v. Vohs v. Ronald W. Dickson, Elizabeth N. Whitaker, II v. Ronald W. Dickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an underwriter is a purchaser with a view to a public offering of a security
• the Ute presumption of reliance is confined by Simon \to making proof of specific reliance on particular omissions unnecessary when the circumstances indicate that the plaintiff placed some general reliance upon the defendant's disclosing material information.\
• the Ute presumption of reliance is confined by Simon “to making proof of specific reliance on particular omissions unnecessary when the circumstances indicate that the plaintiff placed some general reliance upon the defendant’s disclosing material information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).