· 1/22/1974
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,365 Arthur Yale Kavit v. A. L. Stamm & Co., a Co Partnership, and Jack R. Levien
Citations
- 491 F.2d 1176
- 18 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 438
- 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10444
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if federal claims are subject to dismissal or summary judgment, pendent jurisdiction should not be exercised “absent exceptional circumstances.”
- efficient utilization of judicial resources a relevant consideration to the determination whether to exercise pendent jurisdiction
- efficient utilization of judicial resources a relevant consideration to the determination whether to exercise pendent jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friendly, Lumbard, Oakes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.