Skip to main content
· 1/22/1974

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,365 Arthur Yale Kavit v. A. L. Stamm & Co., a Co Partnership, and Jack R. Levien

Citations

  • 491 F.2d 1176
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 438
  • 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if federal claims are subject to dismissal or summary judgment, pendent jurisdiction should not be exercised “absent exceptional circumstances.”
  • efficient utilization of judicial resources a relevant consideration to the determination whether to exercise pendent jurisdiction
  • efficient utilization of judicial resources a relevant consideration to the determination whether to exercise pendent jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friendly, Lumbard, Oakes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.