Skip to main content
· 10/22/1987

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,513 Securities and Exchange Commission, and R.D. McCullough Ii, Intervening v. Richard W. Suter

Citations

  • 832 F.2d 988
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that “changes in fact of law since [the injunction’s] entry” may justify an appeal
  • suggesting that an order denying a motion to vacate an injunction is appealable unless “the only purpose of the motion was to take a belated appeal” (emphasis added)
  • “The motions to vacate the injunction were efforts to create appellate jurisdiction over the injunction long after the deadline for an appeal had passed.”
  • appeal from final order in post-judgment proceedings brings up issues unresolved in main case
  • appeal from final order in post-judgment proceedings brings up issues unresolved in main case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Easterbrook, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.