Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,024 Futura Development Corporation v. Centex Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that perfect identify existed between a parent corporation, on one hand, and its subsidiary and agents, on the other hand
• stating that “district court properly treated [defendant’s] motion to dismiss as a motion on the merits [of the § 10(b) Securities Exchange Act claim] rather than a 12(b)(1
• adopting the “commercial/investment test” to determine whether a note is a security
• in a pre-Reves case, stating that, under the “commercial v. investment” test, a “court looks to see whether a 24 transaction more closely resembles typical investment situations or typical mercantile or commercial transactions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).