Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,679 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, Palmer York, Jr. And George Croke, and Real Parties in Interest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that non-parties could proceed with their claims against the defendants’ assets by the time those assets had been “disentangled” and were ready for distribution
• reversing the district court’s refusal to lift the stay, seven years into the receivership when the receiver was about to distribute assets and thereby disturb the status quo of the estate
• reversing the district court’s refusal to lift the stay, seven years into the receivership when the receiver was about to distribute assets and thereby disturb the status quo of the estate
• looking at whether the status quo could be preserved under a stay
• “In reviewing the district court’s application of this test and ultimate decision, we apply an abuse of discretion standard.”
• “In reviewing the district court’s application of this test and ultimate decision, we apply an abuse of discretion standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).