Skip to main content
· 1/21/1998

Federal Case

Citations

  • 134 F.3d 542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reliance is not an element of the crime of stock manipulation
  • buying and selling of securities was merely one segment of a four-part scheme
  • buying and selling of securities was merely one segment of a four-part scheme
  • “Section 10(b)’s omission of reference to a particular victim is compelling evidence that investor reliance is not required for a securities fraud conviction.”
  • upholding wire fraud conviction based on stock manipulation scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.