Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,031 Charles P. Adams v. Royal Indemnity Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the MCS-90 endorsement voided a limitation on the definition of insured to include a permissive user, eliminating the requirement that the auto be specifically listed on the policy
• once the insurer has paid the injured motorist, the insured is required to reimburse the insurer, so that the public is protected and “ultimate responsibility rests on the truckers, all as mandated by Congress and the ICC”
• court should strike documents in appendix not presented to trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).