Skip to main content
· 10/28/1889

Fearl v. Hanna

Citations

  • 129 Pa. 588
  • 18 A. 556
  • 1889 Pa. LEXIS 990

Syllabus

<p>1. When the return of a service of summons is regular on its face, it will not be set aside because the defendant was induced to come within the jurisdiction, by a letter from the plaintiff inviting him for another purpose.</p> <p>2. In an action to recover back money paid for machinery alleged to be defective, it is not error to submit to the jury the question of delay in giving notice of the defects, with instruction to consider the time when the plaintiff became aware of the defects, and other circumstances.</p>

Judges: Clark, Cubiam, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.