Feagin v. Broglin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “explaining that ‘[cjross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of anóther’ ” (alteration- in Casalduc)
• “Cross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.”
• “Cross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.”
• “Cross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.”
• “Cross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.”
• “Cross-motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).