· 12/29/1993
FDIC v. Keating
Citations
- 12 F.3d 314
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33874
- 1993 WL 530676
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- following Meyerland but assuming without deciding that a district court could entertain timely motions for post-judgment relief
- allowing FDIC to remove then pending state appeal to federal district court
- “Where ... post-judgment relief is no longer available, the district court shall adopt the decision of the state court as its own, prepare the record as required for appeal, and forward the case to the federal appeals court for review”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Per Curiam, Rosenn, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.