F.B.R. Investors v. County of Charleston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a developer did not have a vested right to complete Phase II of its project because it chose to divide the project into two phases and its prior efforts were \directed toward\ completing the first phase
• declining to find a vested right existed to develop Phase II of a project when no construction had begun on Phase II and building permits were not obtained for Phase II
• upon analyzing facts, court determined trial court erred in finding F.B.R. had established a nonconforming use and therefore a vested right to continue it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).