F.B. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state's failure to prove value of stolen items was not fundamental error requiring reversal of defendant's conviction for burglary and first-degree petit larceny
• expressly opining that the error might have been correctable if it had been brought to the court’s attention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• F.B. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-11· cited 200×
• Salvatore Bagnara v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-27· cited 17×
• Aliyev v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-29· cited 11×
• Monroe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-27· cited 7×
• Joseph v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-20· cited 3×
• FB v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-11· cited 2×
• FB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-17
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Barber
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-06-12· cited 144×
• Puryear v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-02-07· cited 124×
• Butterworth in and for Broward Cty. v. Fluellen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-24· cited 121×
• Negron v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-11-13· cited 117×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-26· cited 33×
• T.E.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-14· cited 14×