Skip to main content
· 12/11/2009

Fayne v. Vincent

Citations

  • 301 S.W.3d 162
  • 2009 Tenn. LEXIS 830
  • 2009 WL 4723361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the party invoking waiver has the burden of demonstrating that the issue was “in fact” waived
  • noting that “[t]he jurisprudential restriction against permitting parties to raise issues on appeal that were not first raised in the trial court is premised on the doctrine of waiver.”
  • awarding the appellees attorney’s fees incurred on appeal under the TCPA
  • declining to find waiver where an incomplete record created an ambiguity
  • “[P]arties will not be permitted to raise issues on appeal that they did not first raise in the trial court[.]”
  • “The construction of a statute and its application to the facts of a case are questions of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Holder, Clark, Wade, Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.