Fay v. Haven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it may be possible for the same person to commit acts that constitute more than one type of theft under ORS 164.015”
• noting that “it may be possible for the same person to commit acts that constitute more than one type of theft under ORS 164.015”
• noting the defendant’s argument “that the legislature’s use of the gerund form [in ORS 164.055(1)(c)] suggests that it intended to refer to a defendant’s continuing conduct (that is, being engaged in buying, selling, lending, or borrowing) rather than a single point in time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).