Favrow v. Vargas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• parents must adjust expenses to meet support obligations, not vice versa

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maturo v. Maturo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-04· cited 65×
• Favrow v. Vargas
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-16· cited 60×
• Mulholland v. Mulholland
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-05-04· cited 29×
• Marrocco v. Giardino
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-04-03· cited 17×
• O'Brien v. O'Brien
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-10-16· cited 16×
• Hill v. Hill
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-12· cited 12×
• Feliciano v. Feliciano
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-05-16· cited 10×
• Mullin v. Mullin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-08-18· cited 8×
• Shipman v. Roberts
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-07-26

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Turner v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-18· cited 182×
• 84 Century Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Tax Review
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-26· cited 58×
• Mercado v. Commissioner of Income Maintenance
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-05-12· cited 12×