Fausto v. Credigy Services Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deposition would proceed in the United States rather than Brazil when there was possibility that it would be deemed illegal for American lawyers to take deposition in Brazil

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Outsidewall Tire Litigation
  E.D. Virginia· 2010-05-04· cited 52×
• Patrick v. Teays Valley Trustees, LLC
  N.D. West Virginia· 2013-12-12· cited 13×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hyde & Drath v. Baker
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 223×
• Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc., Ely Valley Mines, Inc., and John Janney v. Helen Dolman, John Janney v. Helen Dolman
  Ninth Circuit· 1964-08-03· cited 113×
• Federal Aviation Administration and United States of America v. M. Marshall Landy and International Aircraft Leasing, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1983-04-11· cited 92×
• Dixon v. Certainteed Corp.
  D. Kansas· 1996-02-14· cited 26×
• Turner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
  M.D. North Carolina· 1988-03-18· cited 24×
• Dwelly v. Yamaha Motor Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2003-04-03· cited 19×