Skip to main content
· 4/3/1998

Faust v. Texaco Refining & Marketing Inc. (In Re Faust)

Citations

  • 270 B.R. 310
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1972
  • 1998 WL 1980431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a creditor violates §524(a)(2)’s injunction by referring a discharged debt to a collection agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hershner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.