Faust v. Faust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• based on evidence of one spouse’s needs and the ability of the other to pay for those needs, a rehabilitative alimony award in the amount of $700 per month was found to be inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frechter v. Frechter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-01· cited 12×
• Faust v. Faust
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-28· cited 5×
• Preston v. Burmeister
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-07-12· cited 3×
• Loudermilk v. Levine, Hirsch, Segall & Northcutt, P.A. (In re Pattie)
  M.D. Florida· 1989-11-08· cited 3×
• Franco v. Franco
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-09· cited 1×
• Wilkerson v. Wilkerson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-08

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-26· cited 179×
• Tronconi v. Tronconi
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-24· cited 67×
• Valentine v. Valentine
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1950-04-25· cited 33×
• Mundy v. Mundy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-11-20· cited 12×