Faus Group, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing intentional interference claim based on the improper means of antitrust violations where the antitrust claim was dismissed
• “[P]erformance of an alleged illegal contractual tie-in provision does not satisfy the continuing violation requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).