Faurisma v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a new trial was ordered where the court could not conclude the “pictures did not inflame the jury to a degree” that they did not consider the lesser offense
• a new trial was ordered where the court could not conclude the \pictures did not inflame the jury to a degree\ that they did not consider the lesser offense
• where irrelevant and prejudicial evidence erroneously admitted, the court could not conclude the evidence did not cause the jury \to reject the plea of self-defense or ... consider the offense of manslaughter\
• autopsy photos showing decedent's cranial bone and brain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).