Faulks v. Crowder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff waived the affirmative defense of insufficient service of process where issue was raised years after service was issued and after plaintiff’s answer -9- had been filed
• referring to the saving statute as a “one-year tolling period” of the applicable statute of limitations
• finding that the defendant physician waived the defense of insufficient service of process and return of service, where the defendant raised the issue for the first time in a motion to dismiss two years after service was issued, and after the defendant filed his answer
• involving the situation wherein the defendant originally objected to lack of service, but after service was allegedly completed, filed an answer that did not allege insufficient service of process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).