Faulconer v. City of Danville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that allegations of contract formation must include “the specific provisions of the contract upon which liability is predicated” (citation omitted)
• noting that “[p]laintiffs were a sophisticated counterparty with access to vast amounts of information about the FX markets” and engaged in “billion dollar FX trading,” all of which “contradict[ed] their claim of reliance”
• dismissing breach-of-implied-covenant claim as duplicative where it “relie[d] on no facts distinct from” the facts underlying the breach-of-contract claim
• dismissing negligence claim against bank “for failure to state an independent legal duty” beyond the contract
• dismissing breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claim because it “relie[d] on no facts distinct from the breach of contract claims.”
• dismissing breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claim because it “relie[d] on no facts distinct from the breach of contract claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).